Hello loyal reader (the singular form was purposeful!).
Spring term, known as lent term here in England, is in full swing and keeping me busy. My studies continue to help me peel back the layers of complexities associated with the field of development. This term I am continuing with my core course on development as well as starting two new courses- one on emerging health threats and the other on public management of development. I am also auditing a class on basic education in developing countries. A nice combination to round out my education, although quite depressing at times.
One of the challenge we have been talking about in great deal is the sheer number of actors and their often diverging priorities- international agencies, local governments, external governments NGOs, media, donors, and list goes on and on.

For example- the United Nations created the Millenium Development Goals to unite agencies and countries around a set of priorities that will help eradicate poverty by 2015. It is quite clear by now that many countries will not meet a lot of these goals. Supporters of the goals suggest that regardless they create a common thread for which to rally the development community and hold everyone accountable for improvement. However, critics argue that this big picture approach dismisses historical evidence that the most successful programs are often locally initiated and not externally defined. Here is an entertaining quick video outlining the MDGs.
Even the business community is getting involved in development work. The Global Business Coalition recognizes that the corporate sector can leverage its assets - financial and human capital- to make headway on some of the leading infectious diseases that are taking millions of lives each year- HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Launched by Richard Holbrooke, the former US Ambassador to the UN, the network has over 200 participating companies from 6 continents. A recent article in the Guardian discussed the work that businesses such as Coca-Cola are having on communities around the globe.

Let us not forget the newcomers to the development industry. Hollywood stars are constantly in the news for raising money and awareness about their favorite causes. Some laude them for their humanitarianism and others criticize them for impacting policy while not being accountable to anyone but themselves. A group of musicians just re-created Michael Jackson's "We Are the World" to raise money for Haiti.
At the same time modern technology and ease of travel is enabling common folks to move from eye-witnesses to ireporters. As the line gets blurred, journalism as an industry is bleeding into development. CNN's Anderson Cooper recently rescued a young boy who was injured during looting in Port au Prince, sparking intense discussions about the objectivity of journalists in emergency settings.
It seems like development is no longer monopolized by young idealists... others are trying to elbow their way in to the industry.